The Doctrine Itself
God for the Platonist is pure intelligence and all things were
reconciled with God before creation - an assumption which scripture does
not appear to contradict. Then as the process of fall began, individual
beings became weary of their union with God and chose to defect or grow
cold in their divine ardor. As the mind became cool toward God, it made
the first step down in its fall and became soul. The soul, now already
once removed from its original state, continued with its defection to the
point of taking on a body. This, as we know from Platonism, is indeed a
degradation, for the highest type of manifestation is on the mental level
and the lowest is on the physical.
Such an account of man's fall does not mean that Origen rejected
Genesis. It only means that he was willing to allow for allegorical
interpretation; thus Eden is not necessarily spacially located, but is a
cosmic and metaphysical event wherein pure disincarnate idea became
fettered to physical matter. What was essential for Christianity, as
Origen perceived, is that the fall be voluntary and result in a degree of
estrangement from God.
Where there is a fall, there must follow the drama of reconciliation.
Love is one of God's qualities, as Origen himself acknowledged, and from
this it follows that God will take an interest in the redemption of his
creatures. For Origen this means that after the drama of incarnation the
soul assumes once again its identity as mind and recovers its ardor for
God.
It was to hasten this evolution that in the fullness of time God sent
the Christ. The Christ of Origen was the Incarnate Word (he was also the
only being that did not grow cold toward God), and he came both as a
mediator and as an incarnate image of God's goodness. By allowing the
wisdom and light of God to shine in one's life through the inspiration of
Jesus Christ, the individual soul could swiftly regain its ardor for God,
leave behind the burden of the body, and regain complete reconciliation
with God. In fact, said Origen, much to the outrage of his critics, the
extent and power of God's love is so great that eventually all things
will be restored to him, even Satan and his legions.
Since the soul's tenancy of any given body is but one of many episodes
in its journey from God and back again, the doctrine of reincarnation is
implicit. As for the resurrection of the body, Origen created a tempest
of controversy by insisting that the physical body wastes away and
returns to dust, while the resurrection takes on a spiritual or
transformed body. This is of course handy for the reincarnationist, for
it means that the resurrected body either can be the summation and climax
of all the physical bodies that came before or indeed may bear no
resemblance at all to the many physical bodies.
There will come a time when the great defection from God that
initiated physical creation will come to an end. All things, both
heavenly bodies and human souls, will be so pure and ardent in their love
for God that physical existence will no longer be necessary. The entire
cohesion of creation will come apart, for matter will be superfluous.
Then, to cite one of Origen's favorite passages, all things will be made
subject to God and God will be "all in all." ( 1 Cor 15:28 ) This
restoration of all things proposed by Origen gave offense in later
centuries. It seemed quite sensible to Origen that anything that defects
from God must eventually be brought back to him. As he triumphantly
affirmed at the end of his "On First Principles", men are the "blood
brothers" of God himself and cannot stay away forever.
Origen of Alexandria Table of Contents
- Page 1: The Controversy
- Page 2: The Doctrine Itself
- Page 3: Scriptural Support for Reincarnation
- Page 4: Conclusions

